Myths continue to dominate discussions of the so-called right-to-work laws, as witnessed by letters to the editor and comments from columnists who should seem to know better.
The principal myth is in the name, “Right-to-work,” since the law confers no right to a job for anyone! It’s an ancient bit of clever marketing by pro-business lobbyists to misname something so as to give advantage in a debate.
Myth No. 2 involves the view that leaders of unions – sitting in far-away seats of luxury – make decisions for the union’s members. Nothing could be further from the truth: by and large unions are one of the most democratic institutions in our society, where decisions are made through voting, where strikes require extraordinary support and where officers are elected. (To be fair, there have been situations where unions have acted undemocratically, but such occurrences have been widely overplayed and are now largely in the past.)
Myth No. 3 covers the principle of the union shop, which is often mislabeled a “closed shop” that has been outlawed since 1947. The union shop merely requires all workers to pay for the right of representation, based on the principle that all workers who benefit from the wages and benefits bargained by the union should pay the costs of such representation. In addition in “open shops,” where not all workers are members, the union is required by law to represent every worker – union or not – in grievances without discrimination. Thus, the union must defend a non-member worker who is fired just as vigorously as a member worker.
Myth No. 4 is that unions cause a company to close, as referenced recently in the Hostess Bakery closing in Kansas City. Recognize that a decision to close up shop is made by management, not the union; in fact, unions have many times worked hard to cooperate with companies to take actions to save firms in financial troubled. In most cases, mismanagement or failure to keep up with technology is behind company closures.
Myth No. 5 is that if workers don’t like the wages or benefits or the treatment they receive at a company, they’re free to quit and go elsewhere. That’s like saying, “Don’t let the door hit you on the way out!” Can the workers have NO say in these matters? Today, finding a job is not as easy as the letter writer may think.
Myth No. 6 is that somehow companies will flock to Michigan now that it has this slave labor law in place. Check out the reasons why companies move; far down the ladder are the labor laws. Far higher up is the ability to attract skilled workers, something that better-paid union workers usually provide.
There have been many myths perpetrated in the labor law discussions, and they should not color the thinking of policy makers in Wisconsin. — Ken Germanson, Jan. 1, 2013